首页> 外文OA文献 >Rituximab maintenance therapy after autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with relapsed CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Final analysis of the collaborative trial in relapsed aggressive lymphoma
【2h】

Rituximab maintenance therapy after autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with relapsed CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Final analysis of the collaborative trial in relapsed aggressive lymphoma

机译:复发性CD20 +弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者自体干细胞移植后利妥昔单抗维持治疗:复发性侵袭性淋巴瘤协同试验的最终分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose: The standard treatment for relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). The impact of maintenance rituximab after ASCT is not known. Patients and Methods: In total, 477 patients with CD20 + DLBCL who were in their first relapse or refractory to initial therapy were randomly assigned to one of two salvage regimens. After three cycles of salvage chemotherapy, the responding patients received high-dose chemotherapy followed by ASCT. Then, 242 patients were randomly assigned to either rituximab every 2 months for 1 year or observation. Results: After ASCT, 122 patients received rituximab, and 120 patients were observed only. The median follow-up time was 44 months. The 4-year event-free survival (EFS) rates after ASCT were 52% and 53% for the rituximab and observation groups, respectively (P = .7). Treatment with rituximab was associated with a 15% attributable risk of serious adverse events after day 100, with more deaths (six deaths v three deaths in the observation arm). Several factors affected EFS after ASCT (P <.05), including relapsed disease within 12 months (EFS: 46% v 56% for relapsed disease after 12 months), secondary age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (saaIPI) more than 1 (EFS: 37% v 61% for saaIPI <1), and prior treatment with rituximab (EFS: 47% v 59% for no prior rituximab). A significant difference in EFS between women (63%) and men (46%) was also observed in the rituximab group. In the Cox model for maintenance, the saaIPI was a significant prognostic factor (P <.001), as was male sex (P = .01). Conclusion: In relapsed DLBCL, we observed no difference between the control group and the rituximab maintenance group and do not recommend rituximab after ASCT. © 2012 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
机译:目的:复发性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的标准治疗方法是抢救化疗,然后是大剂量治疗和自体干细胞移植(ASCT)。尚不知道ASCT后维持利妥昔单抗的影响。患者和方法:共有477例CD20 + DLBCL患者首次复发或对初始治疗无效,被随机分配至两种挽救方案之一。经过三个周期的挽救性化疗后,有反应的患者接受了大剂量化疗,然后进行了ASCT。然后,每2个月随机分配242例患者使用利妥昔单抗治疗1年或观察。结果:ASCT后122例接受利妥昔单抗治疗,仅观察到120例患者。中位随访时间为44个月。利妥昔单抗和观察组的ASCT术后4年无事件生存(EFS)率分别为52%和53%(P = .7)。在第100天后,利妥昔单抗治疗与发生严重不良事件的危险性相关,风险为15%,死亡人数更多(观察组中6例死亡,3例死亡)。多种因素影响ASCT后的EFS(P <.05),包括12个月内复发的疾病(EFS:46%对12个月后复发的疾病占56%),第二年龄校正后的国际预后指数(saaIPI)大于1(EFS) :对于saaIPI <1,为37%对61%,而先前曾用利妥昔单抗治疗(EFS:对于不使用利妥昔单抗,则为47%对59%)。在利妥昔单抗组中,女性(63%)和男性(46%)之间的EFS显着差异。在用于维护的Cox模型中,saaIPI是重要的预后因素(P <.001),而男性(P = .01)也是如此。结论:在复发性DLBCL中,我们观察到对照组和利妥昔单抗维持治疗组之间无差异,并且不建议ASCT后使用利妥昔单抗。 ©2012,美国临床肿瘤学会。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号